Legal Opinion

Kinsey v. Town of Kenly

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1965No. 527PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

While the administrator is now the party plaintiff, this is a personal injury action. Hereafter, David Bethea, the injured person- — -original plaintiff, will be referred to by name (Bethea) rather than as plaintiff or original plaintiff.

Bethea was injured about 12:05 a.m., on Sunday, October 30, 1960, as a result of a collision of -three automobiles. The collision occurred on U.S. Highway #301, a main north-south route, which passes through the Town of Kenly, a municipal corporation. Within the corporate limits of Kenly, in the area where the collision occurred, three lanes for northbound…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. Atlantic Greyhound CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Melton v. CrottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Starnes v. . TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Meece v. DicksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Skinner v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kaisner v. KolbSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Lugtu v. California Highway PatrolCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Wilson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Lugtu v. California Highway PatrolCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Purnell v. HuntDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API