Legal Opinion
Kennedy v. Wurth
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 13, 2002No. 01-2619PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Montez Kennedy, a Michigan state prisoner, appeals pro se a district court judgment dismissing without prejudice his civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, as required in 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Kennedy filed this complaint against thirteen employees of the Michigan Department of Corrections, raising numerous claims for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carson Lynn Brown v. Raymond G. Toombs, Warden Peter W. Vidor, Named as Pete Vidor on Complaint, Deputy Warden Ray Palmer, Adw of Custody T. LunaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Napoleon Hartsfield v. Pete Vidor, Deputy, Sued in His Individual and Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Kennedy v. TallioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Demetrius Knuckles El Errick E. Payton-Bey Michael Vaughn v. Raymond G. Toombs, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Frank Jones v. Tim Smith, Correction Counselor Dr. A. M. CorderoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pullen v. CombsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020