Legal Opinion
Frank Jones v. Tim Smith, Correction Counselor Dr. A. M. Cordero
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 21, 2001No. 00-5734PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Frank Jones, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se a district court order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed under the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Jones filed this action against a prison counselor and physician. He alleged that he suffers from back problems, diabetes, and high blood…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Carson Lynn Brown v. Raymond G. Toombs, Warden Peter W. Vidor, Named as Pete Vidor on Complaint, Deputy Warden Ray Palmer, Adw of Custody T. LunaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- White v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
4Cited by27 opinions
- O'GUINN v. Lovelock Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Douglas Thomas v. Shawn Woolum, Richard Kepler Charlotte Starcher Billie Waddell, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Douglas Fauconier v. Harold ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Lyle v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Johnson v. OzmintDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.