Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Ty. B.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 2005No. 01-FS-1307, 01-FS-1320Published

1DissentReid, Associate Judge

This is not a constitutional error case. Nor is it a jury case in which .the trial court erroneously instructed the jury. Rather, this case involves some instances where the trial court erroneously applied principles governing exceptions to the hearsay rule. Therefore, the- ultimate question is whether the trial court’s error was harmless. We articulated the proper standard of review for this case in Robinson v. United States, 628 A.2d 1234 (D.C. 1993):

[T]he appropriate test for reversible error is the standard set forth in Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 765, 66 S.Ct. 1239, 90…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. Eugene CoreyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. Pietro Tussa, Rajan Patiwana, Pietro Amato, and Paolo Zummo, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. White v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API