Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Henry

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2010No. 2010-1507PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, James Russell Henry of Gallipolis, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0076478, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 2003.

{¶2} On April 12, 2010, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a nine-count complaint charging respondent with professional misconduct arising from his neglect of client matters, failure to keep clients reasonably apprised about the status of their matters, failure to return unearned fees and client documents, and failure to respond to the resulting disciplinary investigations. The complaint was served by certified mail at respondent’s last known…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. MousheyOhio Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. VickOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. StubbsOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Rutherford.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Toledo Bar Association v. HarveyOhio Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. VickOhio Supreme Court · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API