Legal Opinion

Garland v. Wilcox

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action by Roger Edward Garland through his guardian Kenneth Garland to recover damages for personal injuries which he received while riding in an automobile driven by defendant Robert Kenneth Garland, plaintiff’s brother. The injuries were suffered as a result of an accident in which the automobiles of defendants Robert Garland, Harold Maddy and Gordon Wilcox were involved.

The jury returned a verdict for defendant Maddy and for plaintiff against the defendants Wilcox and Garland; Defendant moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which was granted.

Defendant Robert Garland…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gamble v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Nelms Ex Rel. Nelms v. BrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. Clark v. STRAINOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Corey v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Ritter v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1931

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zanetti Bus Lines, Inc. v. LoganWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Zanetti Bus Lines, Inc. v. HurdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  3. Rough v. LambOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Northland Insurance v. Avis Rent-A-CarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Pyles v. RothSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API