N.E.R.I. Corp. v. New Jersey Highway Authority
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentStein, J.
In a class with motherhood and apple pie, the mandate that governmental contracts be subject to public bidding is almost sacrosanct. Its purpose is “to secure competition and to guard against favoritism, improvidence, extravagance and corruption.” Hillside Township v. Sternin, 25 N.J. 317, 322, 136 A.2d 265 (1957). Statutes mandating public bidding should be “construed *246with sole reference to the public good ... [and] should be rigidly adhered to by the courts.” Ibid. But on occasion, insistence on competitive public bidding can be impractical, formalistic, and inconsistent with the public…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mimkon v. FordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Township of Hillside v. SterninSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Schierstead v. City of BrigantineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.