Legal Opinion

Pierce v. DeQuattro

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This case, described in the bill of exceptions as "an action of ejectment to recover possession of premises” at 6 Eustis Street, Cambridge, is an action of sum*534mary process for possession of such premises, under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 239. The action was begun in a district court by a writ in the form of an original summons, dated October 18, 1935, and returnable October 26, 1935. In that court the defendant was defaulted. He appealed to the Superior Court (see G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 231, §§ 97, 98, 99, 101, 102, 103), where the case was tried to a jury. The plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hodgkins v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  2. Becker v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Schayer v. Commonwealth Loan Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Mondello v. Hanover Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Proctor v. MoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marshall v. FrancisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  2. McLaren v. CespedesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API