Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Little

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 8, 1998PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

In this appeal we hold that “prisoner mailbox rule” is applicable to petitions under the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546 (PCRA). The prisoner mailbox rule provides that the date of delivery of the PCRA petition by the defendant to the proper prison authority or to a prison mailbox is considered the date of filing the petition.

Appellant Ellery Little appeals pro se from the order denying him relief pursuant to the PCRA on the basis that his petition was not timely filed. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Smith v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Robert Jenkins v. Superintendent Laurel HighlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Thomas v. ElashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. CastroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. CriderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Com. v. Betts, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API