Ealey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON REHEARING.
October 13, 1920.
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Appellant has filed his motion for rehearing herein, urging that it was error for the trial court to refuse a special charge asked, telling the jury that one Pois was an accomplice, and that a conviction could not be had upon his testimony alone, etc.
On the trial of the case appellant voluntarily took the stand as a witness in his own behalf, and testified that the picture show in question was open for business on the Sunday charged, and that he operated the motion picture machine therein; that in so doing he was following the instructions of his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Moseley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Lindsay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Matkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.