Legal Opinion

State v. Edelburg

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1986No. 85-0693-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

Rick Edelburg appeals a judgment convicting him of first degree sexual assault, in violation of sec. 940.225(l)(d), Stats. Edelburg argues that the trial court erred by refusing to allow him to testify regarding the possible bias of a witness, giving a coercive supplemental jury instruction, and violating sec. 972.12(2), Stats., by allowing the jury to separate during deliberations. Because we conclude that any errors made at trial were either harmless or waived, we affirm the conviction.

Connie Hudak and Carolyn E. took their children to Carol Renner’s house one night so Renner could babysit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. State v. DyessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Bradley v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Kelley v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EcholsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  3. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  4. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. Smart v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API