Dogra v. Liles

*942Gibbons, J., with whom Cherry and Saitta, JJ., agree,

concurring in part and dissenting in part:

I concur with the majority that this case should be remanded regarding the issues surrounding the interpleader action. However, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the district court lacked specific personal jurisdiction over Jane Liles as a defendant in the Dogras’ negligent entrustment action for two reasons. First, Jane acquired minimum contacts with Nevada when she (1) gave a car registered and insured in her name to her daughter, Susan Liles; and (2) allowed Susan to drive it in…