Budget Rent-A-Car v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges an order of the respondent district court denying petitioner’s motion to quash service of process. A writ of prohibition is the appropriate remedy for a district court’s erroneous refusal to quash service of process. See Judas Priest v. District Court, 104 Nev. 424, 425, 760 P.2d 137, 138 (1988). Nevertheless, because we conclude that petitioner’s contentions have merit and that there is no plain, speedy or adequate remedy available in the ordinary course of law, we have determined in the interest of judicial economy to treat…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Jen D. Cubbage v. Michael Merchent, S.W. Meyer, Parker Community HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Congoleum Corporation v. Dlw AktiengesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- Trump v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Arbella Mutual Insurance v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Dogra v. LilesNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Emeterio v. Clint Hurt and Assocs.Nevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Firouzabadi v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.