Crenshaw v. Chrysler Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:.
Upon a review of the matters presented, we deny plaintiff the relief sought and affirm the decision reached by the Court of Appeals.
I
Plaintiff-appellant was employed at defendant appellee’s Dodge main plant in Hamtramck, Michigan for seven years before being laid off in 1961. In 1963 plaintiff obtained employment at defendant’s Twinsburg, Ohio, plant. While plaintiff retained his seniority with Chrysler, he was required to complete a new application for employment form, take a company physical, and serve a 90-day probation period like any other new employee.
Plaintiff lost his left…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Karaczewski v. Farbman Stein & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Jensen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Shaw v. Grunwell-CasheroMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Boyd v. W G Wade ShowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.