Legal Opinion

Crenshaw v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1975No. 55896, (Calendar No. 16)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:.

Upon a review of the matters presented, we deny plaintiff the relief sought and affirm the decision reached by the Court of Appeals.

I

Plaintiff-appellant was employed at defendant appellee’s Dodge main plant in Hamtramck, Michigan for seven years before being laid off in 1961. In 1963 plaintiff obtained employment at defendant’s Twinsburg, Ohio, plant. While plaintiff retained his seniority with Chrysler, he was required to complete a new application for employment form, take a company physical, and serve a 90-day probation period like any other new employee.

Plaintiff lost his left…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Karaczewski v. Farbman Stein & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Jensen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Shaw v. Grunwell-CasheroMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Boyd v. W G Wade ShowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API