Feustal v. Krul

Lewis, J.,

The master has found as a fact, in this proceeding to have a supposed or alleged marriage decreed null and void, that the respondent had been previously married to one Anthony Krul. This is admitted by respondent to be true. The master further found as a fact, against denial by respondent, that, prior to the supposed or alleged marriage with libellant, respondent had gone through a marriage ceremony with one Carl P. Newton.

It was also found as a fact and as a conclusion of law that Krul was living on May 25, 1923, when the parties to this action entered into the alleged marriage.…