Legal Opinion

Central Coal & Coke Co. v. Lockhart

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 19, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

The appellee instituted this action against the appellant to recover damages for personal injuries. Among other things he alleged in his complaint that he was in the employ of the appellant in its coal mine No. 6 near Huntington, Arkansas; that he was what was known as a “motor runner,” his duties being to operate an electric motor which was run upon a track in the mine and used for the purpose of hauling empty coal-cars from the bottom of the shaft to “partings” in the entry and there picking up and hauling loaded cars back to the bottom of the shaft. He alleged that there was a defective…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bruder v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. Swift & Co. v. O'NeillIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Darden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  4. White v. MoffettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  5. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. SparksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Covington v. Little Fay Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Andrews v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Kemp v. Hunter Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API