Legal Opinion

Perry v. Perry

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2003No. W2001-01350-SC-R11-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HolderJanice M. Holder, J.

in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.

We granted this appeal to determine the correct standard to be applied in modifying a temporary, open-ended award of rehabilitative alimony. We hold that a substantial and material change in circumstances must be shown in order to extend, or otherwise modify, such an award. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Factual Background

William Harwell Perry and…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. EldridgeTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. ShirleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Crabtree v. CrabtreeTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Burlew v. BurlewTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Robertson v. RobertsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2002

4Cited by21 opinions

  1. Konvalinka v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital AuthorityTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Gonsewski v. GonsewskiTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In Re Estate of GreenamyreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  4. Moore v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. Francois v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API