Legal Opinion

State v. Shirley

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1999PublishedCited by 427 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM M. BARKER, Justice.

In this case we consider the proper standard of appellate review of a trial court’s denial of a motion to sever offenses under Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 14(b)(1). For the reasons set forth below, we hold that a denial of a severance will only be reversed for an abuse of discretion. We also hold that the trial court in this case abused its discretion in denying a severance because the methods used to commit the offenses were not so materially distinct or unique as to rise to an inference of identity. Because we find that this abuse of discretion was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. ShuckTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ballard v. HerzkeTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. PartonTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Bunch v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. CarterTennessee Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by427 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. EldridgeTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. GoodwinTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Bogan v. BoganTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. LewisTennessee Supreme Court · 2007

422 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API