Legal Opinion

Kissel Motor Car Co. v. Walker

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1921No. 3598PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Texas; Joseph C. Hutcheson, Judge. Action by the Kissel Motor Car Company against T. E. Walker and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Circuit Judge.

On August 1, 1913, the Kissel Motor Car Company, a Wisconsin corporation, entered into a contract with T. L- Walker of Houston, Tex., for the purcháse and sale by him of *493Kissel Kars during the year ending July 31, 1914. The contract was •entered into through a branch house or representative, the Southwest Kissel Kar Branch, a corporation. The Kissel Motor Car Company had never procured a permit to do business in Texas. The Southwest Kissel Kar Branch had procured such a permit and its place of business was in Dallas, Tex. The contract was accepted and approved in writing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Fuqua, Hinkle & Davis v. Pabst Brewing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Edwards County v. JenningsTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. De Leon v. Manuel Trevino & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Pfeuffer v. MaltbyTexas Supreme Court · 1881

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patrizi v. McAninchTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Patrizi v. McAninchTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Peterbilt-Southern Sales, Inc. v. Pacific Car and Foundry CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API