Prince v. Wood
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action upon bond; from Laurens superior court—Judge Kent. April 22, 1918. .
1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.
1. The contention as to bar by election of a different remedy is without merit. “The plaintiff may pursue any number of consistent concurrent remedies against different persons until he obtains a satisfaction from some of them.” Civil Code, § 5522. “A , rule absolute against the sheriff, ordering liim to pay over money, is neither, an extinguishment of his official 'security, nor a bar to a suit against his sureties. It is but one of several remedies which the injured party may use successively, until he obtains- satisfaction.” Crawford v. Word, 7 Ga. 445. See, on this subject generally,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Board of Education v. DaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Mason v. Commissioners of Roads & RevenuesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Harris v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Jones, Drumright & Co. v. Thacker & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Crawford ex rel. Stanford v. WordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Talmadge v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Ketcham v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Garmany v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927