Legal Opinion

Ketcham v. Hines

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1923No. 13279PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Bank checks are not payment until themselves paid, without an express agreement that they are to be accepted as such. Civil Code (1910), § 4314; Norton v. Paragon Oil Co., 98 Ga. 468 (25 S. E. 501); Brantley Co. v. Leet 109 Ga. 478 (34 S. E. 574); Sims v. Bolton, 138 Ga. 73 (14 S. E. 770).

2. The command of a process final in its nature, directing a levying officer to make by levy and sale the sum of money mentioned therein, is not complied with by receipt of the debtor’s check, and where a levying officer, in lieu of the execution of the process, receives such check, he does so at his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norton v. Paragon Oil Can Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Sims v. BoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Phillips v. Behn & FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  4. Brantley Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Prince v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. M. Kidder & Co. v. Clement A. Evans & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Wilbanks v. James Talcott, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Pichulik v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API