Legal Opinion

Patterson Ex Rel. Patterson v. Weatherspoon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 29, 1972No. 7210SC546PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

“Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 8(a), detailed fact-pleading is not required. ‘A pleading complies with the rule if it gives sufficient notice of the events or transactions which produced the claim to enable the adverse party to understand the nature of it and the basis for it, to file a responsive pleading, and — by using the rules provided for obtaining pretrial discovery — to get any additional information he may need to prepare for trial.’ Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 104, 176 S.E. 2d 161, 167. ‘Under “notice pleading” a statement of claim is adequate if it gives sufficient notice…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Lane v. ChathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Cassels v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Lewis v. Gastonia Air Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. CrumptonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Moore v. CrumptonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API