Patterson Ex Rel. Patterson v. Weatherspoon
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
“Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 8(a), detailed fact-pleading is not required. ‘A pleading complies with the rule if it gives sufficient notice of the events or transactions which produced the claim to enable the adverse party to understand the nature of it and the basis for it, to file a responsive pleading, and — by using the rules provided for obtaining pretrial discovery — to get any additional information he may need to prepare for trial.’ Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 104, 176 S.E. 2d 161, 167. ‘Under “notice pleading” a statement of claim is adequate if it gives sufficient notice…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Lane v. ChathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Cassels v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Lewis v. Gastonia Air Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moore v. CrumptonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Moore v. CrumptonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982