Legal Opinion

State v. Telfair.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 26, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

INDICTMENT against Eliza Telfair for resisting an officer, beard by Judge T. J. Shaw and a jury, at the October Term, 1904, of the Superior Court of Eeanklin County.

1Per curiam

This case having been tried in October, 1904, should have been docketed here at last term. The defendant’s excuse that the “case on appeal” was not settled by the judge till after it was too late to docket at last term in time for the call of the district to which it belongs, is of no force. It was the duty of the appellant to docket the “record proper” in apt time, and upon the call of the district have asked for a writ of certiorari to perfect the transcript. Pittman v. Kimberly, 92 N. C., 562; Porter v. Railroad, 106 N. C., 478, and numerous other cases cited in Parker v. Railroad, 121 N.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pittman v. . KimberlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Porter v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. State v. . DeytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Hinton v. . PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. Green v. Green.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Laney v. . MacKeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Corbett Buggy Co. v. McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. State v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Walsh v. . BurlesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API