Legal Opinion

State v. . Ward

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 27, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendants from Qranmer, J., at January Term, 1922, of Pitt.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee. Cubiam.

The defendants were convicted at January Term, 1922, of Pitt. The appeal was not docketed here until 9 September, 1922. The record proper was not docketed last term, and no motion of cer-tiorari was asked for, and the appeal must be dismissed.

This has been the uniform rule of this Court always, and we have repeatedly called the attention of counsel for appellants to the fact that the procedure in this Court, by the Constitution, is left entirely to this Court, and no act of the Legislature has sought to or could modify the procedure here. Herndon v. Ins. Go., 111 N. C., 384. At…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herndon v. Imperial Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Horton v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Corbett Buggy Co. v. McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. State v. Telfair.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. FurmageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API