Legal Opinion

Helt v. Helt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1899No. 18,611PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.

It appears from the record that one Henry Helt, a widower, having children by a former marriage, married appellee; that he had by her one child, the appellant Mollie Helt, her co-appellants being the children of said Henry Helt by his first wife. ' Afterwards, in 1880, appellee and said Henry Helt were divorced. In 1890, they were again married, but no child was born to them during the last marriage. Afterwards said Henry Helt died intestate, the owner of real estate in Bartholomew county, Indiana, leaving surviving him appellee, his widow, and appellants, his children, one of whom, Mollie…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Haskett v. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Utterback v. TerhuneIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Longlois v. LongloisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Smith v. McClainIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Waugh v. RileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Colbert v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Kramer v. BeebeIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Burget v. MerrittIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Thompson v. HenryIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API