Legal Opinion

HALL v. GASKINS

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided March 25, 2025No. 1:23-cv-01919Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION MITCHELL P. HALL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:23-cv-01919-JPH-KMB ) RICHARD GASKINS, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DIRECTING FURTHER ACTION Plaintiff Mitchell Hall alleges that Defendant Richard Gaskins violated the Eighth Amendment by leaving him in a segregation cell that was covered in vomit, urine, and feces for three days, during which time he had no mattress, medication, or hygiene supplies. Dkt. 15 (Screening Order). Officer Gaskins moves for summary judgment, arguing that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Rodosvaldo Pozo v. Gary McCaughtry Randall Gerritson, and David HautamakiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API