Legal Opinion

United States Railroad Administration v. Hilton Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, J.,

after stating the case: The jury found in answer to the first and third issues that the plaintiff lawfully refused to accept the two shipments tendered by the defendant, the one car on 18 March, 1918, for delivery at Guenther’s Siding, Philadelphia, and the two cars on 22 March, 1918, for delivery at New York and at Brooklyn. -These responses were made under binding instructions from the court, or what amounted to peremptory instructions, for his Honor told the jury that if they believed the evidence and found the facts to be as testified to by the witnesses, they would answer the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Puritan Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. LangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Russell v. Carolina Central R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Hocking Valley Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Elam v. . Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Kearney v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Perry v. First Citizens National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Yowmans v. . HendersonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Piedmont Supply Co. v. RozzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API