Legal Opinion

Piedmont Supply Co. v. Rozzell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1952No. 306PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYalbNtiNb, J.

The appellant assigns as errors, (1) the action of the trial judge in overruling his demurrer and denying his motion for judgment as of nonsuit; and (2) certain portions of the charge on the ground (a) that the trial judge included in his charge statements of fact neither admitted nor shown by the evidence, and (b) that the charge amounted to a peremptory instruction for the plaintiff on the first issue, although the evidence of plaintiff and defendant was in sharp conflict.

Under our decisions, there was sufficient evidence to repel the motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit and to require…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Kearney v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Donlop v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. State v. . WyontSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. ButcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Green v. BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Penny v. Seaboard Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Clark v. BarberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API