Barish v. United Mine Workers of America Health & Retirement Fund
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MENCER, District Judge.
Currently before the court is a claim for disability pension benefits under a plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq. (ERISA). Both parties have moved for summary judgment.
On March 23, 1984, plaintiff Andrew Barish suffered a heart attack while employed as a bulldozer operator at the Bolgna Coal Company. As a member of the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA), he sought benefits from the UMWA 1974 Pension Trust under the eligibility requirements set forth in the 1974 Pension Plan (the Plan). 1 The Plan…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Luby v. Teamsters Health, Welfare, & Pension Trust FundsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Diane C. Luby v. Teamsters Health, Welfare, and Pension Trust Funds, Charles J. Schaffer, Jr., and Patricia J. Golosky, Patricia J. Golosky, Diane C. Luby v. Teamsters Health, Welfare, and Pension Trust Funds, Charles J. Schaeffer, Jr., and Patricia J. Golosky, Teamsters Health & Welfare Fund of Philadelphia & Vicinity and Charles J. Schaeffer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Haley v. American International Life Assurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Leahy v. the Bon, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1992
- Gramling v. Grit Publishing Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.