Legal Opinion
Cab-Tek, Inc. v. E.B.M., Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 5, 1990No. 87-372PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Defendant E.B.M., Inc. appeals from a superior court decision finding it liable to plaintiff Cab-Tek, Inc. for debts owed plaintiff by Acousti-Phase, Inc., a corporation owned and controlled by the same individuals who owned and controlled E.B.M. Defendant argues that the evidence presented at trial did not support the court’s finding of a de facto consolidation, which justified the “piercing of the corporate veil.” We agree that there was no de facto consolidation. Nevertheless, because a de facto merger did occur, we affirm.
E.B.M. is a Vermont corporation formed in 1978 for the purpose of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Raymond Leannais and Catherine Leannais v. Cincinnati, Incorporated and Cincinnati-Forte Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Forest Laboratories, Inc., (Cross Appellant) v. The Pillsbury Company, (Cross Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Ladjevardian v. Laidlaw-Coggeshall, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- American Railway Express Company v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1920
- Wilson v. Fare Well Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nevitt v. NevittSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Walsh v. Cluba and Good Stuff, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- P.F. Jurgs & Co. v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Kpc Corporation v. the Book Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Gladstone v. Stuart Cinemas, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.