Legal Opinion

Hill v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1944No. 5620PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTS, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Hamlin L. Hill, filed suit against appellees, W. N. Foster, Mrs. Zula Kayser Stewart, a feme sole, Mrs. Lillie Kayser Butler and husband, Earl H. Butler, in trespass to try title to recover 100 acres of land in the Orsan Shaw Survey, located partly in Montgomery County and partly in San Jacinto County.

Appellees answered generally and by a cross-action in trespass to try title.

Trial was had without a jury before the court and judgment was rendered against appellant and for appellees on their cross-action, from which judgment appellant perfected his appeal to the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Cook v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ogden & Johnson v. BosseTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Witt v. HarlanTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. NilesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Johnson v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1883

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hill v. FosterTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Smith v. Temple Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Means v. Protestant Episcopal Church Council of the Diocese of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API