Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Taylor

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1883No. Case No. 1513PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Kaufman. Tried below before the Hon. Green J. Clark.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

This action was brought by the appellees against the heirs of Amanda McDonald, represented by guardian, and against their co-defendants, to correct by judgment a *362certificate of acknowledgment, which was alleged to have been properly made, but defectively certified, to a deed by which it was alleged that Amanda McDonald had sold and conveyed land which she owned in her separate right.

The action was brought under art. 4353 of the Revised Statutes, which is as follows: “ Where the acknowledgment or proof of the execution of any instrument in writing may be properly…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Payne & Dewey v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Howard v. . MootNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Cross v. EvertsTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Southwick v. . SouthwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Town of Danville v. PaceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Red River National Bank v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Stewart v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Fristoe v. Leon & H. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Johnson v. BryanTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Interstate Building & Loan Ass'n v. GoforthTexas Supreme Court · 1900

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API