Legal Opinion

Shlim v. CML, INC.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 1992No. 88C-10217; CA A64066Published

1Opinion of the Court

829 P.2d 1012 (1992)

112 Or. App. 597

Nathan SHLIM and Sylvia Shlim, Appellants,

v.

CML, INC., an Oregon corporation, and Mabel Baughman, Respondents.

88C-10217; CA A64066.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted April 24, 1991.

Decided April 22, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied June 17, 1992.

John H. Heald, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellants.

Michael Mills, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.

DE MUNIZ, Judge.

This is a sequel to our decision in Shlim v. Alimeg, Inc., 87 Or.App. 178, 742 P.2d 54,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. German Loan Society v. KernOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. In re the Marriage of BatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Shlim v. Alimeg, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Shlim v. CML, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API