Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Keystone Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 1968No. Appeal, 201PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

In this case, the plaintiff was insured under a standard Family Automobile Policy issued by the de fendant. On June 26, 1964, plaintiff’s automobile was damaged by a third parly. Plaintiff promptly notified the defendant of the loss and had the automobile, a 1960 Corvair, repaired at a cost of $710.00. He then filed a claim with the defendant for $610.00 under the policy provision for collision loss minus $100.00 deductible. The defendant, being of the opinion that the cost of repair exceeded the value of the automobile, offered to pay plaintiff the amount of his claim…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Corace v. BALINT (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Furia v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Roberts v. Fireman's Ins. Co. of NJSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Appeals of the Forest Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Company v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Bradford v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Gentex Corporation v. Helicopter Helmet, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Hammer v. Crain Bros., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API