Legal Opinion

Smith v. Weaver

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 1909No. Appeal, No. 240PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 240, Oct. T., 1908, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1893, No. 589, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Edward W. Smith v. Francis D. Weaver and George Young. Assumpsit upon a bond. Before Wiltbank, J. The terms of the bond are set forth in the opinion of the Superior Court. At the trial the court refused to receive in evidence an affidavit of the surety in the bonds tendered by the plaintiff to the defendant.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 240, Oct. T., 1908, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1893, No. 589, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Edward W. Smith v. Francis D. Weaver and George Young. Assumpsit upon a bond. Before Wiltbank, J. The terms of the bond are set forth in the opinion of the Superior Court. At the trial the court refused to receive in evidence an affidavit of the surety in the bonds tendered by the plaintiff to the defendant. The evidence showed that the defendant had expressed dissatisfaction with the bonds, and had refused to accept them. There was no evidence…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

The nonsuit entered in this case, the refusal to take off which is the principal assignment of error, is justified upon either of two separate grounds: First, there is no evidence of a breach of the condition in the bond for which recovery is sought. . Evidence of the breach is absolutely necessary to recovery. Second, the contract, for the execution of which the bond in suit was given, was based upon a condition precedent which was not complied with. The condition of the bond was for permission of the plaintiff to make a transfer of certain engraved copper plates of maps…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Singerly v. ThayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  2. Nelson v. Von BonnhorstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  3. Adams Radiator & Boiler Works, Ltd. v. SchnaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Howard v. SmedleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  5. Delahunty Dyeing Machine Co. v. Pennsylvania Knitting MillsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perry v. SpellmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. LAMAR COUNTY ELEC. CO-OP. ASS'N v. Risinger, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  3. Lamar County Electric Cooperative Ass'n v. RisingerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Perry v. Spellman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API