Moss v. State

The defendant was convicted under an indictment which charged that he did possess a still, apparatus, appliance, or some device or substitute therefor, to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors or beverages, subsequent to December 1, 1919.

There was no error in the ruling of the court in sustaining the demurrers to the pleas in abatement, and in overruling the demurrers to the indictment. Powell v. State, 18 Ala. App. 101,90 So. 138; Ricketts v. State, 18 Ala. App. 162, 90 So. 137.

The defendant testified that at the time of his arrest the officers making the arrest shot at…