Legal Opinion
United States v. James Louis Nazzaro
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 11, 1973No. 350, Docket 72-1791PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:
Rarely is there a case reaching us after conviction in which the defendant believes he has received a fair trial. The human tendency to blame a trial judge for the jury’s verdict of guilt is a frailty we often encounter, and almost as frequently we find such claims to be without merit or substance. Once again we are asked by a convicted defendant to consider a claim of improper conduct on the part of a trial judge. In this instance, however, we believe the record amply demonstrates that the defendant, James Nazzaro, did not receive a fair trial. Although “it…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. David T. DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Albert GrunbergerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. BrandtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Frank Guglielmini and John TestaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Richard Clinton AllsupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Carlos Manuel Parodi, United States of America v. Edwin Barton Conway, United States of America v. Robert Lee LawsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Harry BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- McNair v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1992
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.