Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 24, 2004No. 4D04-3954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In his petition for habeas corpus relief, Carl Brown makes a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. For the reasons stated below, we deny the petition.

The state charged Brown with armed robbery, armed kidnapping, and aggravated battery in an amended information. The information alleged Brown had committed the offenses on a person named Kevin Pope. The jury returned guilty verdicts on armed robbery and aggravated battery, the trial court having previously granted a motion for judgment of acquittal on the armed kidnapping charge. Brown alleges his appellate attorney provided…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Snipes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Raulerson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Jacob v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holborough v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Corbett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Roland Long v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. IVAN LOUIS RODRIGUEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API