Holborough v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.
At the trial of this crime against a person, the trial court erred in allowing hearsay evidence alone to establish the -victim’s identity.1 Because there was not competent evidence of the victim’s identity, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Appellant was charged with felony battery, which involves a defendant’s commission of a misdemeanor battery under section 784.03(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2010), where the defendant has a prior battery conviction. See § 784.03(2) Fla. Stat. (2010). The information charged that Hol-borough did
actually and intentionally touch or strike Andrea Berube…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hearn v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Snipes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Raulerson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Schaffer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Jacob v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Roland Long v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- ASAD U. KHAN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Gregory Freeman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.