Legal Opinion

United States of America v. Erick Rahumid Hobbs

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 5, 2025No. 1:22-cv-01881Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : v. : Criminal No. DKC 18-322 Rel. Civil Action DKC 22-1881 : ERICK RAHUMID HOBBS : MEMORANDUM OPINION Erick Rahumid Hobbs (“Mr. Hobbs” or “Petitioner”) filed a motion under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (“§ 2255 motion” or “motion to vacate”) on July 22, 2022.1 (ECF No. 95).2 After having been granted an extension of time to file a response, (ECF No. 99), the Government filed a response in opposition, (ECF No. 101), and Mr. Hobbs filed a reply, (ECF No. 102). Mr. Hobbs also…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API