Legal Opinion

(PC) McQueen v. State of California

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 12, 2022No. 2:17-cv-00378Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAMORY MCQUEEN, No. 2:17-cv-0378 WBS AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this 18 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 Before the court is plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). See ECF No. 22. As 21 explained more fully…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API