Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. Johnston

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 15, 1985No. 83-608, 83-609PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These cases were consolidated on appeal. At issue is the validity of a "cover-all" or "Mother Hubbard" clause in a standard producer's 88, oil, gas, and mineral lease, and whether it is ambiguous.

The facts are as follows: Co-appellant H.P. Cain acquired Lot 16 of the Grand Bay Land Company Subdivision on August 14, 1946. In December of 1974, Cain leased the south half of Lot 16 to E.L. Dunn. In January of 1975, Cain leased the north half of Lot 16 to appellee J.B. Johnston, Jr. This lease contained the following Mother Hubbard clause:

"This lease also covers and includes, in addition to that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Co. v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Smith v. AllisonTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Collier v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  4. Silk v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Gunnels v. JimmersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McAlister v. DeatherageSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Knight v. SealeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Moseley v. Lewis and BrackinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Medley v. SouthTrust Bank of the Quad CitiesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Fairhope Single Tax Corp. v. ReznerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API