Garcia v. Maciel
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 ORLANDO GARCIA, Case No. 21-cv-03743-JCS 6 Plaintiff, ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE 7 v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING STATE CLAIM 8 JESUS GARCIA MACIEL, et al., Defendants. 9 10 I. INTRODUCTION 11 On January 3, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff Orlando Garcia to show cause why the 12 Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Garcia’s state-law Unruh Civil 13 Rights Act claim for the reasons stated in Arroyo v. Rosas,
19 F.4th 1202
(9th Cir. 2021). See dkt. 14 33. As ordered, Garcia has…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. Carmen RosasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Schutza v. CuddebackDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- George Acri v. Varian Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Alfredo Kuba, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. 1-A Agricultural AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.