Legal Opinion

Phipps v. Harding

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 7, 1895No. 211PublishedCited by 19 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Wisconsin. This suit was brought to recover the amount of a promissory note executed by the Hudson Furniture Company (a corporation of the state of Wisconsin), dated Hudson, Wis., March 20, 1892, payable April 11, 1893, to the order of Edgar Harding, the defendant in error, for the sum of Sr>,000, payable at the North National 35a,nk, Boston, Mass.

Read the full summary

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Wisconsin. This suit was brought to recover the amount of a promissory note executed by the Hudson Furniture Company (a corporation of the state of Wisconsin), dated Hudson, Wis., March 20, 1892, payable April 11, 1893, to the order of Edgar Harding, the defendant in error, for the sum of Sr>,000, payable at the North National 35a,nk, Boston, Mass. Prior to its delivery or'acceptance, the plaintiffs in error severally signed their names upon the back thereof for the purpose of giving credit to such note with tlie…

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, Circuit Judge

*470We .are not at liberty to review the evidence to ascertain whether the finding of the court below upon the facts was warranted by the testimony. We are restricted to the consideration of the question whether the facts as found support the judgment rendered. Jenks’ Adm’r v. Stapp, 9 U. S. App. 34, 3 C. C. A. 244, and 52 Fed. 641. We must therefore consider the case upon the assumption that, at the time of the execution of the note, the Hudson Furniture Company was insolvent, to the knowledge of the individual parties to the note, who were its directors. Whether the term "insolvent,” as…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Burns Mortgage Co. v. FriedSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Ohio Ex Rel. Superintendent of Banks v. EubankMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Murray v. Third Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  4. Smith v. Nelson Land & Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  5. Burrows v. NiblackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API