Henigan v. Ervin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, and from an order allowing costs in excess of three hundred dollars, in a case appealed to said Superior Court from the Justice’s Court of Woodland Township, Yolo County. W. H. Grant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
This action was commenced in the court of a justice of the peace to recover the sum of $222.20 for cordwood alleged to have been sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. The judgment of the justice of the peace was in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $169.95 and for costs amounting to $180.70. The defendant appealed from the judgment to the superior court “ on question of both law and fact.”
A jury trial de novo was had in the superior court, which resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $22.20. Within the time limited by law, and before judgment was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lord v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Dashiell v. SlingerlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Bailey v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Solomon v. ReeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Williams v. MecartneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gardiner v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Erving v. Napa Valley Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Sturgeon v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Erving v. Napa Valley Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Irwin v. JacquesOhio Supreme Court · 1905