Legal Opinion

City of Huntington v. Brown

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1911No. 21,915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Huntington Circuit Court; Samuel E. Goolc, Judge. Petition by Mary Brown against the City of Huntington, for a reassessment of benefits in a street improvement proceeding. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Bums 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellee filed a verified petition under tlie second provision oí section 111 oí the act of 1905 (Acts 1905 p. 219, §8710 Burns 1908), asking the appointment of three apiwaisers to reassess the benefits to her real estate on the ground that the amount assessed against it for the improvement of a street of the city “was excessive,” etc. Appraisers were appointed who reduced the amount of appellee’s assessment. Judgment for costs was rendered against appellant.

It has been held by this court that no appeal lies in such proceeding. City of Seymour v. Jordan (1909), 173 Ind. 717; Randolph v. City…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Randolph v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Cook v. City of ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. City of Seymour v. JordanIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. City of Indianapolis v. BarnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Voss v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holderman v. Town of North ManchesterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Farnham v. SchneiderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API