State ex rel. Bennett v. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
These two actions are original proceedings in mandamus — one brought by Norton county against the highway commission and the other brought by the highway commission against Norton county.
The purpose of the two cases is to determine the condition of the county and state road fund of Norton county on April 1, 1929.
The questions arise from the operations of Norton county and the state highway commission during the operative period of chapter 214 of the Laws of 1925. It was this statute that provided that the state highway system should be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Smith v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- State ex rel. Smith v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- State ex rel. Griffith v. MillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Gray v. GrahamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Pulliam v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- First National Bank v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- State ex rel. Bennett v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934