Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rocky Mountain Dairy Products v. Pease

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 12, 1966No. 21920PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frantz.

This dispute is occasioned by the decision of the Industrial Commission awarding to the claimant Kenneth L. Pease compensation for an injury sustained while “. . . the claimant was an employee of Rocky Mountain Dairy Products.” Rocky Mountain Dairy Products and the State Compensation Insurance Fund (referred to herein as “Insurance Fund”) challenge the propriety of the quoted finding, for, they say, no “contract of hire, express or implied” within the meaning of C.R.S. 1963, 81-2-6 and 81-2-7, can exist in the situation confronting us.

Shoenberg Farms, Inc.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Naranja Rock Co. v. Dawal FarmsSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Robinson Consolidated Min. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  3. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. Continental Oil Co. v. SirhallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  5. Murphy Supply Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Trailways, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  2. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. ApostolouSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Moorhead MacHinery & Boiler Co. v. Del ValleColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Romero v. U-Let-Us Skycap Services, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. ApostolouColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API