Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mizell v. K-Mart Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1991No. 9018SC969Published

1Dissent

Chief Judge HEDRICK

dissenting.

Based on the logic of France v. Winn-Dixie Supermarket, 70 N.C. App. 492, 320 S.E.2d 25 (1984), disc. review denied, 313 N.C. 329, 327 S.E.2d 889 (1985), I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion.

Plaintiff’s argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant because there are genuine issues of material fact and defendant is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiff argues that whether the dangerous condition existed for such a length of time that the defendant knew, or by the exercise of reasonable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hinson v. Cato's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Pratt v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Warren v. Rosso and Mastracco, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. France v. Winn-Dixie Supermarket, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API