Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Yeskel

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 25, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Complainant below, a judgment creditor of William, Yeskel, filed his bill against William Yeskel and others, praying inter alia, that certain conveyances and transfers of property be declared void as against complainant’s judgment and that the same be declared to be the property of William Yeskel and subject to the complainant’s judgment, to the end that the said property might be sold discharged of the alleged fraudulent conveyances and transfers and the judgment of complainant satisfied therefrom.

Pinal hearing being had, the learned Vice-Chancellor determined that the transfers complained…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ready v. ReadyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  2. Jugan v. FriedmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  3. Catabene v. WallnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Cohen v. DwyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  5. Hudson County National Bank v. SouthworthNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API